Why as we become browner and browner do you think


No harm done. Just thought I’d let you know. We allow the left to come in and use the moniker that was in use by constitutionalists only to awaken and find that a positive term is now evil.

The left isn’t resisting a damn thing except the Constitution as it was originally written and intended. The right agrees with the left just enough so as to be unable to help return us to constitutional government. It is a difficult conundrum.


Ask questions instead of making assumptions? Do you really not know what a ? means?

That was 2 questions right there.

States don’t have the right to invite foreigners into their state, never have had that right. As to federal funds, illegals are not entitled to them as a rule, with very few exceptions. Now, both illegals and states do work around those rules, as such illegals receiving in-state tuition rates that are denied by federal law, where the state merely requires a few years and High School graduation from within the state, no status question required. http://theconversation.com/heres-how-undocumented-students-are-able-to-enroll-at-american-universities-69269

And then we have this:

A fair interpretation of the federal statute and state regulation must result in the conclusion that illegal aliens should not receive any form of state public assistance. However, illegal aliens do, in fact, receive state public benefits. That’s because the burden of determining lawful status in the U.S. is on the shoulders of county social services employees who have neither the legal jurisdiction nor the practical ability to determine one’s immigration status. Only an immigration official or federal worker whom the Secretary of Homeland Security has authorized may determine the immigration status of a person in the country.

Typically, any proof an illegal alien provides as evidence of legal status, regardless of its fraudulent nature, will satisfy social services agencies that determine the person’s benefit eligibility because an intake clerk simply cannot make the determination that someone is an illegal alien. Therefore, the law is usually overlooked and illegal aliens manage to qualify for state and local benefits.

Your referred court cases have nothing to do with the subject at hand, nor my questions posed.


Language has such tendencies…naturally.


You’re back to your standard stupidity and I’m not going to argue with you. You are unqualified. I don’t do multiple posts. It is a sign of weakness.

When you said that states never had the right to invite foreigners in, that exposed your level of education. But, I’m not going to argue with you. You’re wrong and if someone else wants a particular fact, they can ask on the board. The cases cited have everything to do with the OP.

You’re here looking for a fight, but you’ve already been beaten. If you want to troll me, there is a thread here for it. You’ve been spanked before; no point in giving you a repeated beat down. It’s a waste of time.


The thing that makes this most difficult is that a fifteen minute verbal conversation would the equivalent of at least 50 posts on these boards.

It’s kind of hard to articulate a point if you look at it from that perspective.

Add to that professional trolls want to pretend they know the subject matter, but wait for you to make a point so they can criticize it - sometimes over and over when they have nothing of substance by which to attack you with.

The Democrats were all about the wall idea, for example and then the Republicans took the lead, rehashing the talking points Bill Clinton made. Somebody should inject a new perspective into the conversation.


I can agree with that of course. I’m still trying to figure out though from your posting whether your an America firster or a partisan.


I do not belong to the right nor the left. I even find fault with enough of the Libertarian platform that they would not endorse me.

When Donald Trump said he wanted to make America great again, we did not ask for specifics. I can give you specifics. The issue is, when I point out that in early America the states decided who came and went within their states, it ruffles the feathers of the National Socialists - who wrote the current talking points for what I call the anti-immigrant lobby.

I know their talking points because when I was barely in college, I worked for them writing those points. It’s difficult for some people to come here and claim I’m left - then right - then Libertarian when the fact is I got involved on all sides of the issue and worked, diligently, to make sure I understood the issue.

There IS an immigration issue. America, as we know it, will fall into decline; genocide against whites is already being subtly employed. The America our forefathers fought, bled and died in order to establish is almost a forgotten memory.

But, what the right fails to acknowledge - because they can’t see past Nationalist Solutions that Bill Clinton adopted before the current anti-immigrant lobby did, is that their “solutions” (if you call regression a solution) won’t work. The white people in America don’t accept their part in the equation. They think they should not be held accountable. They don’t understand that MILLIONS of their people are drug addicts, criminals, reprobates, and non-Christians.

You could ship every Hispanic across the border, even the Hispanics born here whose parents were undocumented. You could then ship the blacks to Africa, the Jews to Israeli settlements and deport the Muslims. You could do all of that, wake up tomorrow and the posterity of the founders would still be in terrible shape.

Deporting people will NOT clean up the criminal records of those who have served time. A wall will not deter the drug dealer with an American clientele with big bucks. Telling an employer who they can and cannot hire will not make that business profitable.

My point is, if America had been all that great, how come you suppose the people don’t want to simply back track and see what laws we put into place that caused the problems we have today?


Sadly, your claims are just that, your claims. Claiming I am wrong about something doesn’t make it so. :man_shrugging:


Maybe you should point out what law the states used to invite foreigners here, I mean with your “superior” education and all. Again, claiming I’m wrong about something without showing I am doesn’t bode well for you, so give us something more then your inept opinion.


Why would a political party endorse you? Are you running for office? SMFH


Yet you are short on specifics, you simply state something and then whine like a bitch when someone challenges your inept claim. :man_shrugging:


Yet its demonstrated you don’t really know the issue, all you know is your talking points. :YAWN:


But is so. Let the OCD be your guide.


It’s been shown to you over 100 times on more than twenty different boards. Having an argument with you here won’t change the facts.

The reason I don’t argue with you is that a wise man said, "Never argue with an idiot. They will only drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

So, if you continue the argument, where does that leave you?


Your aversion to point by point replies to your often verbose ramblings is quite understandable though unjustified by your lame excuse that it progressively increases the length of posts in the thread.

The most apparent benefit of such replies is the added clarity in the casual reader’s ease of recognition regarding which sentences in the reply are related to the various parts of your mini-dissertation. That increases the likelihood that some of your attempted points will be successfully rebutted…and you don’t like that feature.

It is not a sign of weakness. Your refusal to read them is a sign of sustained ignorance, the precursor of stupidity.


Well, then you should have no problem linking to just one instance then should you?


Did your boyfriend help you with all of that?

Coming from a man with a board name that sounds like a disease wherein a nerve in your eye got tangled up with a never in your ass giving you a shitty outlook on life, you should STFU and let this conversation proceed minus your personality contest posts.

If something don’t pertain to you, then scram.


Cross posting is looked down on here and you know where the thread is that you can troll me on.


:YAWN: Post a single link out of the many you claim, it should be easy to do.


Oh, what a cute, puerile reply!

I can respond to any post made on this site if and when I choose. The fact that you get your panties in a wad over any occurrence of criticism is a sign of psychological adolescence.

Here’s a suitable pacifier for you.